Introduction to Co-Design Promoting Responsible AI & ML Systems in Healthcare
AI and ML are transforming healthcare around the world, resulting in positive outcomes for both doctors and patients. However, it’s crucial to ensure that these technologies are serving all communities equally and effectively. This is where co-design comes in, which actively involves users and stakeholders from the beginning. As AI/ML systems become more integrated into federal health IT solutions, co-design is even more important in providing human-centered design solutions that actually address real-world issues. Co-design is also important in the context of government healthcare technology initiatives, due to the constant need for transparance and acccountability.
Co-Design Enhances Usability & Equity in Healthcare
Oftentimes, the traditional development of AI/ML systems prioritizes technical performance over human needs. This can unintentionally lead to bias or ineffective solutions. Co-design provides a solution by bringing in diverse voices. This means that marginalized communities are directly brought into the design room. This inclusive process effectively prevents bias in algorithms by ensuring that the voices of all patients are heard and translated into real solutions. For instance, veterans may face unique mental and physical challenges. Incorporating co-design ensures that VA health IT contracts offer more targeted and responsive solutions that accurately reflect the needs of veterans.
Additionally, software adoption and usability are increased when co-design is incorporated because end-users are more likely to use a product that they contributed to. For instance, including clinicians and nurses in the design process ensures successful adoption because they can make sure their ideas and voices are directly reflected. This can mean technologies incorporating more automated administrative tasks that lessen clinician burnout. Furthermore, this also means that co-design is effectively integrated into clinician processes, rather than disrupting current processes.
Co-design Promotes Trust, Safety, and Compliance
Currently, AI/ML systems face challenges regarding trust and accountability. For instance, some patients may be worried that incorrect algorithms or even biased algorithms may result in misdiagnosis, privacy violation, and even ethical breaches. Co-design targets these issues by promoting transparency and participation in the design and testing process. This is especially crucial for government healthcare technology, where accountability to the public is required. Furthermore, co-design ensures that technologies comply with protecting patient data, often by proactively shaping technologies to meet regulations rather than waiting until the end. This preventative approach decreases liability concerns and promotes long-term sustainability.
Consequences of Not Incorporating Co-design
Co-design is crucial to promoting AI and ML technologies. This is because co-design promotes responsible innovation that is both inclusive and efficient. Additionally, the consequences for not incorporating co-design are often severe. For instance, minorities may be overlooked by bias in algorithms, clinicians may refuse to incorporate new AI/ML processes in their workflows, and patients may refuse to use AI due to a lack of trust and transparency. Therefore, co-design promotes a shift from technologies being built for people to technologies being built with people. Ultimately, co-design must be incorporated to promote transparency, successful adoption, trust, and equity in healthcare.
HITS
Overall, healthcare continues to advance rapidly in terms of the vast amount of data continuously being collected. Therefore, it’s important that this data is being used effectively to empower clinicians rather than hinder them by making it harder to make data-based decisions. Furthermore, government health programs must incorporate data analytics in a way that benefits diverse patient populations. This means that clinicians should be able to make faster and smarter clinical decisions in a way that doesn’t result in burnout or dissatisfaction among providers and patients. Ultimately, clinicians must be empowered with the tools they need to be successful so that healthcare shifts toward proactive and evidence-based care.
References
